Madras High Court suspends lawyer close to A Raja

 

  A Division Bench, comprising Justice F.M.Ibrahim Khalifulla and Justice M.M.Sundaresh, said  the status of R K Chandramohan, a member and subsequently as Chairman of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondichery, shall stand suspended forthwith.
RK Chandramohan has been dismissed as the Chairman of the Tamil Nadu Bar Council. He allegedly tried to influence Justice R Regupathy to grant anticipatory bail to his client - a man named Dr Krishnamurthy and his son - both men were wanted by the CBI for forging mark-sheets.
  
He  should not not be permitted to function as such pending disciplinary action by the Bar Council of India, the bench said.

  Disposing of a petition by a lawyer, the Bench appended a portion of a letter written by a former judge of the court Justice S Reghupati, who had reported  that Chandramohan had entered his chamber last year and pleaded that the case of a father and a son, accused in a marks scandal case in Puducherry, for anticipatory bail be considered favourably as they were "family friends of a Union Minister by name Raja".
 
The lawyer handed over his mobile phone to the judge saying that the "union minister is on the line to have a talk with me".    "I discouraged such conduct of . Chandramohan and told him that the case would be disposed of in accordance with law,if listed before me," Justice Reghupati had said in his letter
of July 7, 2009  to the then Chief Justice of India.
 
Justice Reghupati, who has since retired, had in his letter, complained about the Chandramohan's "outburst and uncontrollable" behaviour.
 
Earlier, the judge had in the open court last year alleged that a Union Minister, through a lawyer, attempted to speak to him on telephone seeking favours in a case being investigated by CBI posted the matter to another judge. But he had not not named the minister.

   In his letter to the CJI, Justice Reghupati had observed that " a counsel, who made an attempt to exert influence on the court by using the name of a Cabinet minister, cannot be allowed to succeed in snatching an order in his favour by advancing threat".
 
  The issue became a raging controversy that the then CJI had told the media that the judge had sent a report to him making it clear that no no union minister spoke to him directly.